The review board in Oklahoma has rejected a proposed settlement regarding the state’s mental health system, citing concerns over the lack of transparency and collaboration in the negotiations. The settlement, which was intended to address issues such as access to care and overcrowding in facilities, was put forth by Attorney General Mike Hunter and Governor Kevin Stitt. However, the board raised issues with the process and ultimately voted against approving the agreement.
The rejection of the settlement comes amid growing tensions between Hunter and Stitt, with the two officials engaged in a public spat over the handling of the mental health crisis in the state. Hunter has criticized Stitt for not involving him in the negotiations and accused the governor of prioritizing political gain over the well-being of Oklahomans.
The review board’s decision to reject the settlement highlights the need for greater transparency and collaboration in addressing mental health issues in Oklahoma. Advocates for mental health reform have called for a more inclusive process that involves input from a diverse range of stakeholders, including patients, providers, and advocates.
The failure of the settlement also underscores the challenges facing the mental health system in Oklahoma, which has long been plagued by issues such as underfunding, overcrowding, and lack of access to care. As the state grapples with these challenges, it is clear that a more coordinated and collaborative approach is needed to ensure that all Oklahomans have access to the mental health care they need.
Overall, the rejection of the proposed settlement serves as a reminder of the work that still needs to be done to improve mental health care in Oklahoma and the importance of working together to address these critical issues.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com